52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks (2026-28): A Record I Read Differently Now
The weekly prompt is provided by www.amyjohnsoncrow.com. The prompt for the week of June 29 is "A Record I Read Differently Now."
Some time ago—years, actually—I obtained the death certificate for Grace Bagby Hutson. At the time, it was the key document that allowed me to work backward on information about my wife's great-aunt. One of the details I copied from the death certificate was the birth date: September 19, 1889. Or perhaps it was 1888, which had originally been written and then crossed out. The informant listed on the death certificate was Grace's younger sister, Elizabeth "Lizzie" Bagby Tucker. Since the informant was her sister, I assumed the information was correct. But given that the year had been altered, I had to wonder: was the date correct, too?
Around the same time I was compiling records for this family unit, I found a birth register entry in Fluvanna.
 |
| Cropped image of the 1889 Birth Register for Fluvanna County. Line of interest is line 5. |
As you can see on Line 5:
Date: Oct. 11
Name: Bagby
Father: Jno W. Bagby
Mother: Loula Bagby
At the time, I didn't record this as the birth of Grace. I wasn't sure if the date was accurate or if this was definitively the correct entry for her. In my notes, I wrote: "Is this record really Grace's birth register? The date is 1889, but it says October 11, not September 19. The record does not indicate a child's name, but lists John and Lula as parents." I also noted that in the 1910 US Census, Loula indicated she had seven children, five living. At that point, I had accounted for all the known children, so the numbers seemed to match.
In preparing for this week's blog prompt, I revisited my uncertainty regarding this entry. I decided to read the document differently. A little older, a little wiser, and having much more experience with historical records, I now see it with fresh eyes. Because the birth register was recorded much closer to the actual event, the "October 11" date likely reflects the most accurate information provided at the time, far more reliable than the memories of surviving siblings documented decades later.
This experience serves as a powerful reminder that our research is never truly "finished." We are constantly growing as researchers, and sometimes, the best way to move forward is to look back at the records we thought we understood, and read them again with the benefit of the experience we have gained along the way.
No comments:
Post a Comment